
September
19, 2001My Story about September 11th
The
place I work at is around the corner and about a block and a half
from "ground zero." For whatever reason, I never heard the
first boom, but the second, and larger one scared the pants off me
and everyone else in the office, as well as making the building shake.
We all ran to the window in the conference room and there were, almost
immediately, hordes of people running up Murray St. to Broadway, away
from the World Trade Center.
At first,
we didn't know what to do. None of the folks on the ground seemed
to know where they were going and none of us wanted to be a part of
that. We turned on the TV but the cable wasn't working properly and
we could only hear, but that's how we found out what had actually
happened.
Some co-workers
who had stopped at a client first and were just coming in had walked
through the WTC court and had actually seen some folks who had thrown
themselves from the windows and these co-workers were walking wounded
and needed our attention.
We figured
at least we were safe (for the moment) where we were. There was some
smoke, but it seemed like there was nothing for us to do. Then, out
of nowhere the lights in the office flickered several times. We looked
at each other and said, "We're outta here!" Everyone ran
and got their stuff, turned off their computers and we all went out
into the main hall.
As we got
to the staircase, a voice came over the building PA system and hysterically
yelled that everyone should leave the building immediately. No one
had to tell us twice. When we got down to the lobby floor and opened
the door, the smoke was billowing into the building itself and by
the time we reached the doors, we could see nothing but a solid wall
of smoke in front of us. You couldn't see three feet ahead of you,
if that.
There were
2 cops standing right in front of the doors telling us to leave the
building and go north up Broadway. I managed to keep sight of two
of my co-workers and we started up Broadway. For the first 5-6 blocks,
it was solid smoke, full of particulates that made us choke and gag
and got into our eyes and covered us with white film. We later found
out that this was debris from the WTC itself.
After we finally
got out of the smoke, we turned around to see what was happening and
that's when the first tower collapsed. I dearly hope never to see
anything like that again in this or any other lifetime.
We continued
up Broadway and a short time later the other tower went. People were
panicking, but considering the incredible number of people in the
streets, it was almost eerily quiet. No one knew what to do. Cell
phones weren't working and people were desperate to get a hold of
loved ones. No one knew how they'd get home unless they lived in Manhattan,
like me.
No one knew
if trains/buses were running or even if Penn Station or Grand Central
Station were open. Nothing. Everyone was trading no information and
speculation. I kept thinking that it was like one of those old campy
Roger Corman sci-fi movies, like The Killer Tomatoes Devastate
New York. It was that surreal. The white film that was covering
everyone who had come from downtown like us just added to the unreality
of it. I walked the 2 1/2 miles home and the folks I was with went
to the Port Authority (1) and to her son-in-law's office (the other).
I was never so glad to see my own house, I can tell you.
August
27, 2000I Just Don't Get It
Every
so often something comes along that, even after I think about it,
still leaves me with a lasting feeling of, I just don't get
it. While I can't speak for anyone else, I find this feeling
not only annoying but disconcerting. It makes me want to figure out
why I don't get it, and what bothers me about it.
I know there are some things
that I'll never understandcold fusion, abstract mathematics
and why people like hot dogs on a stick, for instance. But it doesn't
bother me at all that I don't understand these thingsthey're
just stuff outside my sphere and I accept my own shortcomings.
Occasionally, though, I'm
both at sea and bothered at the same time. This happened recently
and it's been bothering me ever since, and now I think I'm finally
getting a handle on it and I'd like to share, in case anyone else
thinks about these things too.
A short time ago my sister-in-law
Jane sent us an article she had clipped from a magazine, as she thought
we'd find it entertaining. It was a very long article about a youngish
man who has lived for years in the back hills of the south somewhere
with few modern conveniences and very limited contact with anything
most of us would call popular culture, even in its' broadest sense.
He doesn't read magazines or own a TV. He certainly isn't computer-friendly.
For a long time he lived in a tepee on his land, but he's moved up
to living in a tool shed now, but presumably without heat or electricity.
He kills or grows all his own food and makes his clothing from the
hides of the animals he kills to eat. To cultivate his land he uses
an old-fashioned animal-drawn plow.
In order to support this
lifestyle (which he has chosen freely, as opposed to being forced
there out of poverty or other need) this fellow gives lectures to
various school groups on the value of his way of life. He runs camps
at his property at regular intervals to show people how they can live
this way. He has even come up with a fully-developed plan to encourage
families all over the country to adapt to his way of life, step-by-step
(the first step is giving up the TV and then other electrical appliances
and progresses from there).
After reading this article
and absorbing the fact that the author, although she admits that this
sort of life is not for her, clearly finds this man's lifestyle most
admirable, my question was (and remains), why?
Granted, from biblical
times onward there have always been people (mostly men) who have chosen
to live apart from the society of their day. St. Jerome and Thoreau
come imemdiately to mind (although Thoreau didn't do it forever and
still kept active friendships with many of the intellectuals of his
day.) But is this separateness admirable in itself? Is it admirable
for a person to turn his (or her) back on whatever strides society
has made for its' betterment and actively encourage others to do so
as well? I just can't think it is. If it were up to people like the
fellow in this article we'd all be back to living without medicine,
heat, easy communication and the convenience of store-bought food
and clothing. To what end? So that our days could be spent killing
and raising our own food and making those clothes rather than (perhaps)
trying to make the world a better place?
To me, this fellow seemed
so supremely egocentric and self-satisfied that the more I thought
about him the more annoyed I became that he might possibly turn a
child who potentially could invent the cure for cancer into a Davy
Crockett clone of himself.
Don't get me wrong. I think
that many of us, myself included, have perhaps gotten too far away
from the natural order of things. If we live in a large city we probably
get no closer to actively participating in the growing of things than
a planter on our terrace or a few herbs on the windowsill. I grew
up, in the suburbs of New York City, honestly believing that meat
naturally came in cellophane wrapped containers, never really putting
it together with the animal that gave it's life for it. A lot of people
had small vegetable gardens, but they certainly didn't depend on them
for their main sustenance. It's a great thing that there are now,
in NYC for instance, co-operative gardens that allow people the opportunity
to raise vegetables or flowers in Manhattan even if they have no house
garden of their own. That seems a healthy way to incorporate a respect
for nature into a modern existence. Or, if one lives in the suburbs,
one would of course have a garden of some sort on their property.
Certainly most city-dwelling
(and probably suburban) women today don't make their own clothesand
why should they? It certainly doesn't save time or money. And unless
you're incredibly talented, they certainly don't look better. Why
would we want to give up our well-fitting store-bought clothes for
ill-fitting (and probably smelly) ones we made from animals we had
to kill in the first place to get the hides? Or from sheep that we
had to tend, shear and spin the wool from just to get the fabric?
What would this prove? That we could go back several hundred years
to a time when most people were desperately looking for a way to make
that time-consuming and unpleasant task easier?
I finally do understand
now what it is about this fellow in the article that annoyed and disconcerted
me. He wants to go backwards and he wants us all to join him. Not
only do I find this idea unpleasant, I find it dangerous. Dangerous
to women because it would again tie them to home and kitchen. Dangerous
to society because progress would cease and ignorance would grow.
Far from encouraging this man to talk to children and encouraging
them to his way of life, I would stop him from having contact with
young minds. If you want your kids to get a sense of what life was
like a few hundred years ago take them to Williamsburg or one of the
other well done historical restorations, so that he can appreciate
how far society has come since then and how lucky he is to live in
a time when he is free to make strides of his ownbut always
forwards, not backwards.
July
15, 2000
Maybe
Richard's "rocks" have started to rub off on me. Maybe I'm just getting
crabby on my own. Or maybe it's just that there are fewer things that
annoy me, but when they do, they do.
In any case, I
was half-watching the TV Food Network the other day and Martha Stewart
came on. I guess I should say that as a rule of thumb, Martha really
gets on my nerves. Not only does she preach living a lifestyle that
would probably make very few people happy, but she does it in a tone
of voice that makes it plain that if you're not doing it her way you're
just not trying.
When I started
to think about what it was about her that set me off, I realized it
was several things:
- She is almost
anal about exact measurements and quantities for things, whether
it be a recipe or a crafting project. For instance, when she needs
a teaspoon of salt in a recipe, she always measures it. Most of
the other chefs who have their own shows, as well as most reasonably
proficient home cooks, can measure out a teaspoon of a dry ingredient
into their hand and pour it into whatever is cooking. But not Martha.
Everything is just so and exactly the same every time. This is not
fun cooking. This is work. I've always thought that the reason a
lot of people don't like cooking is because they imagine it's too
exact (and exacting!). If the only person they watch is Martha,
they're right. She makes cooking seem daunting instead of fun and
creative. And she makes it seem as though perfect is the only result
that is acceptable.
- In the same
vein, her kitchen, her crafting area, her other TV rooms look as
though nothing in the way of real life ever happens in them. Nothing
is "homey." Everything is perfect and foursquare. If I ever were
to spill something or drop something in a room like hers I'd probably
just run and hide.
- She doesn't
look as though she's enjoying herself! If you ever watch any of
the other popular chefsBobby Flay, Ming Tsai, Mario Batali
or (especially) Emerilyou notice right away that they are
loving what they're doing and they want to share their love of food
with you. They're full of ideas to help you substitute or alter
their recipes. They want to make it easy for you to try something
new. They mostly preach minimalism in terms of cookware and kitchenware.
Not Martha. On the show I watched, she was toasting sesame
seeds for a recipe. Most of us would do that either in the oven
or in a hot, dry frying pan. Martha recommended a Japanese sesame
seed toaster such as the one she "picked up" in Tokyo, but that
poor you "might be able to find" in a Japanese market. Who in their
right mind would even waste their time looking for such a thing?
How often would you use it?
- She's a rotten
dresser. She must be making a fortune in her various enterprises.
Why can't she wear anything other than ill-fitting button-front
blouses and black slacks? If she's propounding a well-lived lifestyle,
can't she manage to look the part? We're not talking couture kitchen
clothing, but surely she might find a few moderately appealing outfits.
What kind of frumpy role model is she? Even Julia Child dressed
better than she does!
I believe in cooking
for other people and I do think one should make food look attractive,
as well as taste good. But people like Martha make the average person
feel insecure about their own abilities. If you like the stuff she does,
by all means emulate it. Some of it is terrific. But don't worry about
trying to duplicate her efforts exactly so that you can feel rotten
if you fall short. Remember, you're doing it on your own. She has a
whole staff to help her!
November
28, 1999
Hi
again! I'm finally getting around to a second installment of recipes.
All three of the recipes are quick (less than an hour from start
to serve) and good. All are among Richard's favorites (and you know
how picky he can be!). I don't know that they should all be served
together to form one meal, as I think the tastes would not complement
one another, but that's up to you. I served the soup with rolls and
a simple green salad for a quick dinner. The Ben Benson salad was
served with a roast chicken and potatoes. I've served the Lemon Dessert
with lots of different things and it's always delicious. All three
recipes are ones I've adapted from other sources, to suit myself.
I hope you like them as much as Richard does!
HEARTY CORN
& CLAM CHOWDER
4 Servings
3
slices
bacon (I used turkey bacon), chopped
1
cup
onion, chopped
1
carrot, chopped
2
tsp
dried thyme leaves
1
large
bay leaf
1
lb
red-skinned potatoes, peeled & cut in 1/2" dice
8
oz
bottled clam juice
1
cup
evaporated skim milk
15 oz
creamed corn (canned)
2
cans
chopped clams (6.5 oz. each), undrained
Saute bacon in heavy medium pot over
medium heat until fat begins to render, about 3 minutes. Add onion
and carrot and saute until vegetables begin to soften, 5-8 minutes.
Add thyme and bay leaf; stir, 30 seconds. Add potatoes, clam juice
and evaporated skim milk. Cover pot, reduce heat to medium-low and
simmer until potatoes are tender, 15-20 minutes. Add corn and the
clams with their juice; simmer about 2 minutes. Season soup to taste
with salt and pepper and serve.
BEN BENSON'S
SPECIAL SALAD
(Adapted from a recipe used at Ben
Benson's Steakhouse in NYC)
6 Servings
3
medium cucumbers, peeled/halved/seeded/coarsely
chopped
1
small
onion, thinly sliced
1/4 cup
white wine vinegar
1/4 cup
canola oil
3
Tbs
sugar
2
Tbs
fresh dill, chopped
1/2 lb
green beans, trimmed & cut into 1/2" pieces
1
lb
asparagus, trimmed & cut into 1/2" pieces
8
oz
hearts of palm (canned), cut into 1/2" pieces
2
med.
ripe tomatoes, cut in 1/2" dice
1
cup
lettuce (I used Boston) thinly sliced
2
anchovies, patted dry and finely chopped
Place chopped cucumbers in a large bowl.
Add sliced onion to cucumbers. Toss cucumber mixture with vinegar,
oil, sugar, dill and salt and pepper to taste.
Have ready a bowl of ice water. In a
large saucepan of boiling salted water, cook beans until crisp-tender,
about 5-6 minutes and transfer with a small sieve or slotted spoon
to the ice water, to stop cooking. Add beans to cucumber mixture.
Return water in pan to boil and cook asparagus until crisp-tender,
about 4-6 minutes. Transfer to ice water to stop cooking. Drain asparagus
in a colander and pat dry. Add to cucumber mixture.
Rinse and drain hearts of palm. Add
with tomatoes and lettuce to cucumber mixture and season with salt
and pepper. Toss. Add anchovies to the bowl and toss again. Serve.
LEMON DESSERT
8-12 servings
1
cup
flour, unsifted
1/2 cup
margarine, softened
1/3 cup
nuts, chopped fine in the food processor
8
oz
low-fat cream cheese (not the whipped kind)
1
cup
Confectioner's sugar
2
cups Cool-whip
lite
2
pkgs Instant lemon
pudding mix (approx. 3.75 oz. ea.)
Preheat oven to 350°.
Mix flour, margarine and nuts in medium
bowl. Press into a 7x11" or 9x13" glass baking dish. Bake 12-15
minutes in preheated oven, or until light golden brown. Cool.
While crust is cooling, mix cream cheese,
sugar and 1 cup Cool Whip with a hand mixer or spoon to thoroughly
combine. Spread over cooled crust. Mix lemon pudding as directed
on package. Pour over cheese layer. Refrigerate for 1 hour. Top with
remaining whipped topping. Chill until ready to serve.
October 3, 1999
Hi!This
will be my first attempt at Pamís Corner. I have many favorite recipes,
both my own and ones Iíve adapted from other sources. I hope youíll
like them and try them, and that youíll let me know how they turned
out. I also would love it if you let me know how you change or adapt
any of my recipes to fit your own needs and tastes - I can always
use the input and the insight, and I might like your way better!
This Spinach Lasagna recipe is adapted
from the Wellness Lowfat Cookbook. I found it to be good-tasting as
well as healthy.
SPINACH
LASAGNA
3/4 lb.
mixed fresh mushrooms, sliced
3
cloves garlic,
minced
1
cup
onion, chopped
2
cans
tomato puree (16 oz. each)
1
tsp.
dried basil
2
tsp.
dried oregano
2
T
fresh parsley, chopped
salt and pepper to taste
1/2 tsp.
red pepper flakes
12 oz.
lasagna noodles (regular or spinach)
2
pkgs.
frozen chopped spinach, thawed (10 oz. each)
1
T
olive oil
1
pinch nutmeg
2
cups low-fat
cottage cheese (1% fat)
2
oz.
part skim mozzarella cheese, shredded
2
T
Parmesan cheese, grated
Bring a large saucepan of water to the
boil. Cook lasagna noodles according to package directions. Drain
and set aside.
Preheat oven to 350°. Spray a 9x13î
glass baking dish with nonstick spray.
Meanwhile, combine the mushrooms, garlic
and all but 2T of the onion in a large nonstick skillet; cover and
cook over medium heat, stirring often, about 5 minutes, or until the
vegetables soften. Add the tomato puree to the skillet. Stir in the
basil, oregano, parsley, a pinch of salt and pepper and the red pepper
flakes. Partially cover and simmer for 30 minutes, stirring occasionally.
Squeeze the excess water from the spinach.
Cook the reserved 2T onion in the 1T olive oil in a nonstick skillet
until softened. Add the spinach and cook, stirring, until the liquid
evaporates. Add salt and pepper to taste and the nutmeg and remove
skillet from heat.
Place the cottage cheese and milk in
a blender and process until smooth; set aside.
Spread a little tomato sauce on the
bottom of the prepared baking dish. Form a layer using 1/3 of the
noodles, 1/3 of the tomato sauce, half of the cottage cheese mixture
and half of the shredded mozzarella. Repeat with 1/3 of the noodles
and tomato sauce, and the remaining cottage cheese, mozzarella and
spinach mixture. Top with remaining noodles and tomato sauce and the
Parmesan cheese.
Cover loosely with foil and bake for
50-60 minutes or until bubbly; remove foil during the last 10 minutes.
Let lasagna stand 10 minutes before serving.
Total time: About 1 hour 45 minutes.
Note: You can add ground turkey
or ground chicken to the tomato sauce, as well as chopped Italian
cooking peppers. Whole wheat lasagna noodles work fine too. This recipe
can easily be doubled to serve a larger group.
Home The
Rocks Ramblings
Photo Gallery Guest
Appearances Pam's
Corner
Biosketch
Contact Us Guestbook
Discussion Board
F.A.Q. Links